Interoperability Standards in Electronic Health Records

Let’s Talk Health Informatics.

The importance of interoperability standards in electronic health records (EHRs) cannot be overstated. They ensure patient data is shared consistently and accurately, both internally and externally across different health care systems. Interoperability standards also enhance patient safety and quality of care, prevent health information from getting and staying locked in silos and help meet patients where they are.

Interoperability refers to the ability of different IT systems and software applications to communicate, exchange data and effectively use and display information shared at the point of care or at any time in the clinical workflow that requires medical decision making. Without standardized protocols, this exchange becomes fragmented, leading to inefficiencies and a potential, incomplete clinical picture and errors in patient care.

The lack of interoperability standards may also result in miscommunication among health care providers, duplicated tests, delayed treatments and, ultimately, compromised patient safety. Comprehensive data analysis essential for monitoring public health and developing effective health care policies may also be hindered.

Implementing interoperability standards is a complex process involving multiple stakeholders, including clinicians, informaticists, IT developers, policymakers and patients. The complexity arises from the need to integrate diverse systems, each with their own data formats, terminologies and protocols. Harmonizing these systems requires meticulous planning, extensive testing and ongoing collaboration among all parties involved.

The development and adoption of universally recognized standards are crucial to enabling EHR interoperability. Examples of such standards are Health Level Seven’s (HL7) Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) and HL7’s Fast Health care Interoperability Resources (FHIR). Examples of terminology standards are Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) and Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC). These standards, along with many others, provide a common framework and language for data exchange, enabling different EHR systems to work together more effectively.

Benefits of TEFCA

One of the most significant developments in promoting EHR interoperability is the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA). TEFCA, developed by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), establishes a universal floor for interoperability across the United States. It is designed to ensure that individuals and organizations can easily and securely access health information, regardless of which EHR system they use. TEFCA provides a comprehensive framework that includes both legal and technical requirements for secure data sharing across different networks [1].

TEFCA is composed of several key components. The “Trusted Exchange Framework” outlines the foundational principles for policies and practices that facilitate data sharing. The framework emphasizes the importance of using federally recognized technical standards, such as those identified in the Interoperability Standards Advisory, to ensure consistency and reliability in data exchange. The “Common Agreement” serves as a legal document that governs the infrastructure for secure information sharing. The agreement establishes the roles and responsibilities of Qualified Health Information Networks (QHINs), which are designated entities that connect different health care organizations to facilitate nationwide interoperability [2].

The QHIN Technical Framework (QTF) is another critical component of TEFCA. It specifies the technical requirements that QHINs must meet to ensure secure and efficient data exchange. By adhering to these standards, QHINs enable a more streamlined and consistent flow of health information across different systems, reducing the need for multiple, point-to-point connections and simplifying the overall data exchange process. This framework not only supports existing health information networks but also expands and improves access to health information by integrating new exchange purposes, such as public health reporting and individual access services [1].

The benefits of implementing interoperability standards through frameworks like TEFCA are many. First, they enhance patient safety by ensuring health care providers have access to complete and accurate patient information at the point of care. This reduces the risk of medical errors, improves the accuracy of diagnoses and ensures patients receive timely and appropriate treatment.

Additionally, interoperability supports care equity by making patient data accessible to all authorized providers, regardless of their location or the specific EHR system they use. This is particularly important for patients who move between different care settings or regions, ensuring continuity of care and preventing information silos [2].

Moreover, interoperability standards improve access to care by facilitating telemedicine and remote monitoring. Patients can receive consultations and care from specialists in different geographical locations, with their medical history and data readily available to the provider. This is especially beneficial in rural or underserved areas where access to specialized care may be limited. In this example, interoperability also enhances the quality of care by enabling health care providers who aren’t necessarily all affiliated with the same health care system, hospital or EHR to make more informed decisions based on comprehensive patient data, including previous treatments, medications and diagnostic results.

Barriers to EHR Interoperability

Despite these advantages, several obstacles still hinder the full realization of EHR interoperability. One major challenge is the variability in how different health care organizations implement and enforce interoperability standards. This inconsistency can lead to fragmented data exchange and reduced effectiveness of interoperability solutions.

In addition, there are technical challenges related to data security, patient privacy and the integration of legacy systems with modern EHR platforms. The high cost of implementing and maintaining interoperable systems is another significant barrier, particularly for smaller health care providers with limited resources [2].

A coordinated effort is needed to overcome these obstacles. Policymakers need to enforce stricter regulations and incentives for adopting interoperability protocols, such as those outlined in TEFCA. Investment in training and resources for health care providers is essential to ensure they can effectively implement and use interoperable systems. Collaboration among stakeholders, including health care organizations, IT developers and standardization bodies, is also crucial to developing and refining interoperability standards. Public-private partnerships can play a vital role in driving innovation and facilitating the widespread adoption of interoperable EHR systems [3].

Aptive is committed to promoting the use of interoperability standards with our clients. Leveraging our expertise in health informatics, we focus on helping organizations align with frameworks like TEFCA. We work closely with our partners to implement solutions that enhance data exchange, improve patient care and support health care innovation. Our approach centers on the belief that effective interoperability is key to a more connected, efficient and equitable health care system. Through continuous collaboration and dedication to excellence, we strive to bridge the gaps in health care delivery and elevate the lives of the millions of people who rely on federal health care services every day.